*Dr Martina Cleary.ย
โDISGUSTโ has been voiced by the founder of the Clare Pyrite Action Group (CPAG) with the vote made by two of the countyโs TDs this week.
On Tuesday in the Dรกil, Cathal Crowe (FF) and Joe Carey (FG) voted against giving extra time for an amendment put forward by the CPAG to the defective concrete block legislation to be discussed. Michael McNamara (IND) voted against the Government while Violet-Anne Wynne (IND) was not present.
Speaking to The Clare Echo, Dr Martina Cleary admitted, โI was disgusted, I was watching it live and I couldnโt believe what I was seeing, it was my worst fear that they would vote against us despite all they were saying. With politics, itโs not what they say, itโs what they do and they voted with their parties and against the people of Clare, it will take time for the people to realise the impact of what they did. The biggest Bill in the Stateโs history will now be passed without due scrutiny or the concerns of homeowners who have experience of thisโ.
Neither Deputy Crowe or Deputy Carey have justified their position to CPAG, their counterparts in Donegal, Charlie McConalogue (FF) and Joe McHugh (FG) were noticeably absent for the vote. โIt is absolutely shocking what has been railroaded, it is disgraceful that people like Cathal Crowe and Joe Carey have the gall to pretend everything will be fine if we get included in a grantโ.
A total of 80 amendments to the proposed legislation had been flagged but will not be considered. โ80 amendments mean there were 80 serious flaws, it is weighted against homeowners,โ Dr Cleary stated. She believed the move was made โto exclude people completelyโ from a redress scheme and warned that a chunk of homes in Clare will now miss out. โThe rationale behind the damage threshold was to prioritise not to exclude, depending on the damage to the house you moved up the line, if you donโt meet it now you wonโt qualify, it was never meant to be that wayโ.
Appeals process on the scheme is โdysfunctional,โ the Crusheen woman highlighted. โIt is designed to knock you out, you only have 28 days to come back if your house is rejected within the new design schemeโ. During this one month window, homeowners will not be allowed to submit additional information, โthe material rejected has to be submitted againโ while a decision will be made based on โa cosmetic visual inspectionโ and not core testing with no access to an independent engineer. An extension from 28 to 90 days for an appeal was one of the amendments put forward by CPAG.
In what she labelled as โa real kicker,โ homeowners that sign up to the scheme will be โhanding over their legal rights to pursue any third party that could be suedโ. She said, โby signing the grant you are signing away your rights to pursue the supplierโ.
Meanwhile, 26 of Clareโs 28 councillors have responded to CPAG outlining that they would support their call for due time and consideration to the amendments. No response was received in the two-day window by Cllr Gerry Flynn (IND) or Cllr Liam Grant (GP), Flynn has previously spoken up for pyrite affected homeowners in the Council Chamber.
Martina told The Clare Echo that some councillors said โthey didnโt like the toneโ of the email received by CPAG. โSeriously itโs time for them to get over themselves, weโre dealing with the biggest crisis in the history of State, itโs spreading like wildfire, the tone Iโm listening to the walls of my house is more disturbing than any tone of an email I could be put together, the tone of that is enough to be worried about rather than briefing councillors what they should know to be talking about, get over themselves. This is the devastation of peopleโs livesโ.