A judge has reprimanded a County Clare woman for her use of Twitter saying โwho do you think you are? Ms Vardy and Ms The-Other-One?”.
At the Family Law Court in Ennis, Judge Mary Larkin referenced the recent libel trial involving Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney in the High Court in London after hearing that the woman was engaging in โdisgracefulโ behaviour when tweeting about her ex-partner on Twitter.
Solicitor for the man, Mairรฉad Doyle told Judge Larkin that the woman has been โdigging constantly at my client on Twitterโ.
Ms Doyle said that the woman โis an avid Twitter user and has always tweeted about my clientโ.
Ms Doyle was making an application that the woman provide a sworn undertaking to court that she no longer tweet about her ex-partner and make no further reference on her Twitter account to Family Law proceedings.
Ms Doyle said that the woman had engaged in โstupid and disgraceful behaviourโ concerning her tweets.
Solicitor for the woman, Ann Walsh told Judge Larkin that her client โis somewhat naive when it comes to the use of Twitterโ. Ms Walsh said that it was a private Twitter account.
After being handed a print out of a selection of the tweets, Judge Larkin described them as โgarbageโ.
Judge Larkin read one tweet from the woman which stated โOnly takes one arsehole to ruin your eveningโ.
Ms Doyle said that a result of the tweets, people are saying to her clientโs family members โMy God, what kind of a Dad is he with the way is he behaving?โโ
Expletive laden insulting WhatApp messages featured prominently in the recent Vardy-Rooney case and Judge Larkin asked the woman: โWho do you think you are? Ms Vardy and Ms The-Other-One?โ
She said: โHavenโt we seen enough of that lately? People washing their dirty laundry in public?โ
Ms Doyle said that the woman โneeds to know the consequences of breaching an orderโ.
After the woman agreed to not tweet any more about her ex-partner or to refer to family court proceedings, Judge Larkin warned her that if she breaches the court undertaking โit is open to me to jail you for contempt of court. I hope that wonโt be necessaryโ.
The woman apologised for a tweet the evening before the court obliquely referring to the upcoming family law proceedings.
The woman said: โI know I shouldnโt – I apologise. I was anxious about the case and I was looking to vent.โ
Judge Larkin said: โIt has to stop. It is awful, just awful. If I hear of it again I will entertain an application to have your ex-partner have custody of the child.โ
Judge Larkin commented: โGod be with the days when people wrote their thoughts down in a diary. You donโt throw it out there for the whole word to see.”
โEverything you have written online can be shown to your child and is out there in the ether.โ
Judge Larkin said that the sworn undertaking relating to the woman not referring to your ex-partner and family law proceedings on Twitter be also be extended to her use of Facebook and Instagram.